Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 score. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Galaxy F62's body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it is somewhat heavier.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 4 cpu cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo features a more vivid screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better display density.
Galaxy F62 has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 7000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a greater camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos, better video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.