Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is way better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's global score of 77.9. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Galaxy Fold is a way newer and extremely thinner device than Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's incredibly heavier.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density and a little bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Galaxy Fold features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and 9 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 448 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Fold shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a camera with a way lower resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.