Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a score of 78.9 against 77.9. Galaxy M20 is a way newer and incredibly thinner phone than Motorola DROID Turbo, although it's a little bit heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M20 has 10 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy M20 has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy M20, because although it has less processing cores (although they are faster) and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a GPU. Samsung Galaxy M20 has superior battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 28 percent more battery size.
The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.