Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's overall score of 77.9. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Even though Galaxy M51 is somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's thinner and also much newer.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M51, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Galaxy M51 has a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M51 features a very superior battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 79% bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a lot better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a larger diafragm aperture and faster 30 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.