Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 general score. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is incredibly newer and thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, although it's also somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440, it also counts with a quite higher screen density.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit superior battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a greater camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in low light environments and a camera with a much better resolution.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.