Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 86.2 score against 77.9. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note10 Lite has the previous 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Although Galaxy Note10 Lite is heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's thinner and newer.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a sharper display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a CPU that's just as good as Motorola DROID Turbo's CPU, because although the Galaxy Note10 Lite has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a back camera with a way worse 12 MP resolution and a lower video definition, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.