Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2016-08-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 has a score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. The Galaxy Note7 is a newer phone, and it's also notably thinner and just a little lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 2560 x 1440px resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo features just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.