Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's global score of 77.9. Galaxy S10's design is a lot newer, incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a little sharper display than Galaxy S10, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels amount per inch in the screen. Galaxy S10 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S10 has a little faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and 5 GB more RAM memory. Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lot worse resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a way larger aperture for better images and video in low-light environments.
Galaxy S10 costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.