Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is way better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's global score of 77.9. Galaxy S10 5G's construction is way newer and notably thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it is also somewhat heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a little faster processor than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. Motorola DROID Turbo features a better looking display than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px, it also counts with a bit better pixels density.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less MP resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a lot larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.