Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a little heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's extremely thinner and also newer. The Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and 5 GB more RAM.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Galaxy S10 Lite captures way better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size aperture, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has higher video frame rate and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy S10 Lite features much more storage to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.