Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 86.3 score against 77.9. The Galaxy S10e body is way newer, somewhat lighter and way thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Galaxy S10e has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The Galaxy S10e has just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture.
Galaxy S10e features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB and more internal memory. Motorola DROID Turbo features longer battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3900mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10e is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.