Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a lot better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a 94.8 score against 77.9. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has an older 13 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Samsung Galaxy S20's construction is noticeably newer, a little lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S20, although it has a quite worse pixel density, a quite smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features much more memory to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM memory and 4 more processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 3% more battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 features a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a much lower 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Although Galaxy S20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.