Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-01-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a general score of 91.8 against 77.9. The Galaxy S21 construction is extremely newer, much thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. These phones come with Android OS, but Galaxy S21 has an older 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better display than Galaxy S21, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Samsung Galaxy S21 counts with a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S21 has just a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 5 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S21 features just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a larger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy S21 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S21, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.