Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, with a score of 93.4 against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy S22's design is incredibly newer, just a bit lighter and notably thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little better performance than Galaxy S22, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory and lesser and slower cores, it also counts with a graphics processor. Galaxy S22 has a bit better screen than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lot lower pixels count per inch of display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
The Galaxy S22 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S22 has a greater camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a much more megapixels back facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light environments.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 5 percent larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.