Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a overall score of 95.4 against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is newer and much thinner, but much heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the older 13 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better screen than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a much larger screen. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser and slower cores, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with greater battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures way better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a way higher video resolution, a larger aperture for better images and video in low light environments and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.