Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE's global score of 76. Motorola DROID Turbo is a somewhat lighter but way thicker device than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version while Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14, so it provides you some additional features and optimized performance.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a higher number of cores.
The Motorola DROID Turbo captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments and a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has improved battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3900mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.