Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.21 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a score of 82.6 against 77.9. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy S25 has older 14 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Galaxy S25 is a thinner and extremely lighter phone than Motorola DROID Turbo.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Galaxy S25 features a screen that's very similar to Motorola DROID Turbo's screen, because although the Galaxy S25 has a lot lower pixel density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Galaxy S25 shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a lot higher video definition, a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low-light environments. Samsung Galaxy S25 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S25 has a bit better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.