Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | -- |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | -- |
| 6.21 ounces | -- |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, with a global score of 90.7 against 77.9. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is a lot lighter and way thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a very superior performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a little bit better looking display than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a just a little worse amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a much larger screen and a little bit higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has improved battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a bigger aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much better 200 MP resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.