Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a global score of 77.9, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 global score. The Motorola DROID Turbo construction is just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy S7 Active, although it is thicker and was released only 20 months before. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have 4 processing cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a bit bigger display. The Galaxy S7 Active features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 200 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 3% larger battery size. Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a camera with a lot better 20.7 mega pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.