Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting an 81 score against 77.9. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Galaxy XCover Pro's design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a worse resolution camera and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, else you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.