Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 88.5 score against 77.9. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's design is notably newer and notably thinner, but just a bit heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and more RAM memory. Motorola DROID Turbo has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots clearer videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a back facing camera with way less MP resolution and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.