Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 general score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's incredibly thinner and way newer. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the previous 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. Motorola DROID Turbo features a better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.