Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a general score of 92.3 against 77.9. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a incredibly newer and thinner cellphone than Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's a bit heavier.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 5 GB more RAM memory. Motorola DROID Turbo features a better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a way less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has an 18% greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.