Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's general score of 77.9. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a incredibly newer and way thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it is also noticeably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Motorola DROID Turbo features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a worse video quality and a camera in the back with much less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos in low-light environments. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.