Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a overall score of 90.6 against 77.9. Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a noticeably newer and extremely thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's heavier. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a much better quantity of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and video and a much more mega-pixels camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.