Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-10-12 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and Grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia 5 II has a score of 87.2, which is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 score. The Xperia 5 II design is incredibly newer, just a little lighter and much thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Motorola DROID Turbo features a brighter screen than Sony Xperia 5 II, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Xperia 5 II features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Xperia 5 II has a little faster CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Xperia 5 II takes slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a worse video definition and a lot less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos. The Sony Xperia 5 II features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size.
Although Xperia 5 II is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Xperia 5 II, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.