Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-07-30 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a general score of 82.2 against 77.9. Even though the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is a lot newer than Motorola DROID Turbo, it is way heavier and a bit thicker. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a bit superior CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and more RAM.
Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a bit bigger display, a way better resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels and a greater pixel count per screen inch. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 400 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 3900mAh battery size. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features just a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Although Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Xperia XZ2 Premium, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.