Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-04-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than the Xperia XZs, having a global score of 77.9 against 77.2. Motorola DROID Turbo is a noticeably older, noticeably thicker and a little bit heavier phone than Xperia XZs. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a much better looking screen than Xperia XZs, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a higher pixel quantity in each display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The Xperia XZs features more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little faster CPU than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra GPU.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 34 percent bigger battery size. The Sony Xperia XZs counts with a way better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, although it has a lesser megapixels back camera and a worse video quality, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.