Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a score of 90.1 against 77.9. Both devices we are comparing here use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is incredibly heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's a little bit thinner and notably newer.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more cores and a higher amount of RAM. Motorola DROID Turbo has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has higher 60 fps video frame rate, a lot higher resolution camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.