Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-05-09 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 80.6 score against 77.9. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite construction is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has an older 11 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a lot better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has better video frame rate, a larger aperture and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution camera. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite and Motorola DROID Turbo both count with really similar memory to store more games and applications, both have equal internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has better battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5260mAh battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.