Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 12 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2022-11-01 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is better than Motorola DROID Turbo, having a global score of 91.5 against 77.9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is a extremely newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than Motorola DROID Turbo, although it is somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has 12 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels amount per inch of display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's processor is just as good as the Motorola DROID Turbo one, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer takes a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low light environments, a back facing camera with much more megapixels and better video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a superior memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a little longer battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.