Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 general score. Even though the Motorola DROID Turbo is noticeably older and notably thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo has a newer 4.4.4 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10.
Motorola DROID Turbo has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo features a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch of display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a very superior memory for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a much better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has higher 30 fps video frame rates, a lot more MP camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5020mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.