Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.3 | 71.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-07-23 | 2020-01-20 |
| 5.41 x 2.80 x 0.28 inches | 5.81 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.83 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue and Red |
| Kevlar | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 120.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 295 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| Motorola X8 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 SDM439 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1700 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| 400 MHz, quad-core GPU | Adreno 505 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 8.44 |
| Camera | |
| 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.81 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2130mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 312 hours standby time | -- |
| 4.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A01 is just a bit better than the Motorola DROID Ultra, with a 71.6 score against 65.3. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A01 has older 11 version and Motorola DROID Ultra has Android 4.4.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy A01 is a lot newer than the Motorola DROID Ultra, it's thicker and just a little bit heavier.
The Galaxy A01 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Ultra, and although they both have a 2 GB RAM, the Galaxy A01 also has a higher number of cores (and they are faster). Motorola DROID Ultra features a slightly better screen than Galaxy A01, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite lower count of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1280 x 720.
Samsung Galaxy A01 features a superior camera than Motorola DROID Ultra, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A01 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better resolution. The Galaxy A01 has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A01 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A01 counts with a really longer battery life than Motorola DROID Ultra, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A01 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.