Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-07-23 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.41 x 2.80 x 0.28 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.83 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Kevlar | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Motorola X8 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1700 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| 400 MHz, quad-core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2130mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 312 hours standby time | -- |
| 4.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a lot better than Motorola DROID Ultra, getting a 79.5 score against 65.3. Samsung Galaxy S7's body is notably newer than Motorola DROID Ultra's, although it is a little bit thicker and a little heavier. The Galaxy S7 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola DROID Ultra, because it has a way higher screen pixel density, a quite bigger display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy S7 has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola DROID Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S7 has a very superior camera than Motorola DROID Ultra, because it has a more megapixels back camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Galaxy S7 counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Ultra, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 200 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S7 has a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Ultra, because it has a 41 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy S7 costs a bit more than Motorola DROID Ultra, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.