Compare phones
Motorola Droid X
ME811, MB810| Global Score | |
| 53.7 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 2.3, 2.2, 2.1 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2010-06-24 | 2019-06-10 |
| 5.02 x 2.58 x 0.39 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 90.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 228 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| TI OMAP3630-1000 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 7.38 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 6,66 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3.2 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 220 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 A has a global score of 64.8, which is way better than Motorola Droid X's overall score of 53.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia 3.1 A has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Droid X has Android 2.3. Nokia 3.1 A's construction is a lot newer and a little bit thinner, but a bit heavier than the Motorola Droid X.
Nokia 3.1 A has a quite better processing power than Motorola Droid X, because it has 1,5 GB more RAM and 3 more cpu cores. Motorola Droid X features a bit more vivid display than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a lot smaller display, a way worse 854 x 480 resolution and a just a bit worse pixel number per inch of display.
The Nokia 3.1 A captures way better photos and videos than Motorola Droid X, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the Nokia 3.1 A also has a way higher (Full HD) video definition. Nokia 3.1 A counts with a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid X, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity.
Nokia 3.1 A features a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid X, because it has a 94% more battery capacity.
The Nokia 3.1 A and the Motorola Droid X cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.