Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel XL's 81.3 overall score. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite construction is newer and just a little thinner than the Google Pixel XL's, but it's also just a little bit heavier. The Google Pixel XL counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite takes a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has better 120 frames per second video frame rates, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a superior battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 45 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.