Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has an overall score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's global score of 83.7. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 20 Lite has 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version, counting with lots of additional features and performance improvements. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite construction is newer and just a little bit thinner than LG V50 ThinQ's, although it's a little heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a better pixels number per inch of display. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite takes much better photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and better 120 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.