Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-08-19 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a little bit better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, with a score of 87.1 against 81. Motorola Edge 20 Lite's design is much newer and a little bit lighter, but also thicker than the Galaxy C9 Pro. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has 11 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a bit sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit higher pixels amount per inch of screen and a bit bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a lot higher video resolution and a back camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 25 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.