Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a score of 87.1, which is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. Even though Motorola Edge 20 Lite is much older and noticeably thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still lighter. These phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 20 Lite has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480, a just a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's camera is very similar to the Motorola Edge 20 Lite one, because although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way lower 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a lot higher video definition.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.