Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android |
| 2021-08-19 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy A32, getting a overall score of 92.8 against 84.7. Motorola Edge 20 Pro comes with Android 12 OS, and Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS. Even though Motorola Edge 20 Pro and Galaxy A32 were released with only a couple of months difference, Motorola Edge 20 Pro is thinner and just a little bit lighter.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bigger display and a higher pixels quantity per display inch. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much better 108 MP resolution back facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A32 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.