Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | -- |
| 2021-08-19 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is better than Galaxy A7 (2018), with a score of 92.8 against 84.2. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro design is extremely newer than Galaxy A7 (2018)'s, but it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit better display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a little bit lower pixels count per display inch, it also counts with a little larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A7 (2018) has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a way better video definition.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.