Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-08-19 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than Galaxy A8 Star, with a 92.8 score against 82.1. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's body is incredibly newer and a little lighter, but also just a little thicker than Galaxy A8 Star. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has the older 12 version while Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a bit larger display. Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with superior battery life than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in low light environments, it also counts with a lot more MP camera and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.