Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-08-19 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.87 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 general score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has older 12 version while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro design is incredibly newer, but just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit better pixel amount per inch of display, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger display.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much higher resolution camera.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.