Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, having a 92.8 score against 79.3. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version, offering a couple nice extra features. Although the Motorola Edge 20 Pro is extremely newer than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, it's somewhat thicker and heavier.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels amount per inch of display. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a quite better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a higher number of faster cores and more RAM.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a lot better video definition and a lot more MP camera in the back. Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.