Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 92.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 12, 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.87 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a score of 92.8 against 77.8. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has 12 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a older and extremely thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola managed to build it somewhat lighter anyway.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a larger screen, a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a camera that is just as good as the Motorola Edge 20 Pro one, because although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way less mega pixels resolution camera and a lower 7680x4320 video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a 27 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.