Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-08-19 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 has a global score of 86.1, which is just a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's overall score of 83.7. Motorola Edge 20 is a notably newer phone, and it is also thinner and lighter than LG V50 ThinQ. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 has newer 11 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 20, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
Motorola Edge 20 counts with a superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a much smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 also counts with a camera with way more MP. The LG V50 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 20 and LG V50 ThinQ have quite similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.