Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-08-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a overall score of 86.1 against 77.8. These devices include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 20 has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Motorola Edge 20's design is way lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it is way thicker and was released many years before.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a just a little greater pixels density, a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a larger display. The Motorola Edge 20 counts with a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 20, because it has more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery life than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a 43% more battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.