Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is a bit better than LG V20, with an 84.7 score against 77. Motorola Edge (2022) is a a lot newer and just a little lighter cellphone than the LG V20, but it's also just a little bit thicker. Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a little better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
LG V20 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The LG V20 has much more storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) takes better photographs and videos than LG V20, and although they both have the same aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution. Motorola Edge (2022) has a superior battery duration than LG V20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V20. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V20, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.