Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-08-18 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), having a overall score of 84.7 against 84.2. The Motorola Edge (2022) is a incredibly newer device than the Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), although it is just a little bit heavier and a little thicker. Galaxy A7 (2018) has a screen that is just as good as the Motorola Edge (2022) one, because although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixel density.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A7 (2018). They have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a much higher video resolution. The Motorola Edge (2022) features a very superior battery life than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.