Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-08-18 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Mineral Gray | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 498.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge (2022), with a 91.8 score against 84.7. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version and Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12 version. Galaxy A71 5G is a a little bit heavier device than the Motorola Edge (2022), but they are equally thin.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A71 5G has a display that is just as good as the screen in Motorola Edge (2022), because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a little worse pixels amount per screen inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge (2022) has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.